Discover More Tips and Techniques on This Blog

How to avoid data set merging problems when common BY variable has different lengths?

When merging 2 datasets with a common by-variable and when that common variable has different variable length, the merge process produce unexpected results.  If you use SAS 9.2 version like me, then SAS Data step will inform you with the following warning:

WARNING: Multiple lengths were specified for the BY variable ****** by input data sets. This may cause unexpected results.

It is good that at least starting SAS 9.2 version, data step issues a Warning message to inform the programmer. But if you use before versions, it is difficult to notice this potential disaster.  

When you see this WARNING message in the SAS log, we might be inclined to ignore this warning because we think this is just a WARNING never realizing the potential danger. When you see this message in the LOG we should be thinking about this instead of avoiding because SAS will do exactly what it states: it may cause unexpected results. In some cases merge won’t even happen between datasets and sometimes the partial merge between the datasets.

Let’s look at the following example.
data table1;
          length visit $13; * LENGTH IS 13;
          visit = "CYCLE 1 DAY 1";
          visitnum = 1;
run;

data table2;
          length visit $14; * LENGTH IS 14;
          visit = "CYCLE 1 DAY 10";
          visitnum = 3;
run;

proc sort data=table1;      by visit;run;
proc sort data=table2;      by visit;run;

TABLE 1;
VISIT
VISITNUM
CYCLE 1 DAY 1
1

TABLE 2;
VISIT
VISITNUM
CYCLE 1 DAY 10
3

*Merge 2 datasets together with common BY variable with different lengths;
data table12;
          merge table1 table2;
          by visit;
run;

*Here is the LOG FILE;

2714
2715  data table1_2;
2716            merge table1 table2;
2717            by visit;
2718  run;

WARNING: Multiple lengths were specified for the BY variable VISIT by input data sets. This may cause unexpected results.
NOTE: There were 1 observations read from the data set WORK.TABLE1.
NOTE: There were 1 observations read from the data set WORK.TABLE2.
NOTE: The data set WORK.TABLE1_2 has 1 observations and 2 variables.
NOTE: DATA statement used (Total process time):
      real time           0.00 seconds
      cpu time            0.00 seconds

As a result of different lengths, SAS adds only one record to the output dataset rather than 2.

*WRONG OUTPUT CREATED;
VISIT
VISITNUM
CYCLE 1 DAY 1
3

*CORRECT OUTPUT SHOULD BE;
VISIT
VISITNUM
CYCLE 1 DAY 1
1
CYCLE 1 DAY 10
3


*To avoid this potential disaster, I’ve used Proc SQL and then created a macro variable with the maximum length of Visit variable in all the datasets in the WORK directory.;

proc sql;
          select max(length) into :maxlength
          from sashelp.vcolumn
          where libname='WORK'
          and name="VISIT";
quit;

*Visit length form TABLE1 is 13 and from TABLE2 is 14, so since I know the maximum length I will used that in here;

data table1_2;
          length visit $ &maxlength;
          merge table1 table2;
          by visit;
run;

*THIS RESULTS IN CORRECT OUTPUT;
VISIT
VISITNUM
CYCLE 1 DAY 1
1
CYCLE 1 DAY 10
3


Disclosure:

In the spirit of transparency and innovation, I want to share that some of the content on this blog is generated with the assistance of ChatGPT, an AI language model developed by OpenAI. While I use this tool to help brainstorm ideas and draft content, every post is carefully reviewed, edited, and personalized by me to ensure it aligns with my voice, values, and the needs of my readers. My goal is to provide you with accurate, valuable, and engaging content, and I believe that using AI as a creative aid helps achieve that. If you have any questions or feedback about this approach, feel free to reach out. Your trust and satisfaction are my top priorities.